Friday, 18 June 2021
Review: In The Heights
Wednesday, 19 May 2021
My Top 10: Films Of 2020
131) Four Kids And It
130) Artemis Fowl
115) Black Is King
74) Kubrick By Kubrick
50) A Whisker Away
5) Feels Good Man - A captivating, creative and almost haunting film documentary that shows how dangerous a creation can be.
4) The Trial Of The Chicago 7 - My high expectations were met in this Aaron Sorkin directed and written courtroom drama about a group of protestors on trial after being charged with inciting riots.
3) The Social Dilemma - A haunting film documentary that shows the manipulation and impact social media has made on recent major events.
2) The Invisible Man - A mystery horror that surprised me in several ways. Director and writer Leigh Whannell transformed this classic horror story into a portrayal of domestic abuse.
The 2021 'DG Movies' Awards
Sonic The Hedgehog
Da 5 Bloods
Eurovision Song Contest: The Story Of Fire Saga
BEST TRAILER:
Onward
Never Rarely Sometimes Always - Never Rarely Sometimes Always
The Sister In The Restaurant - The Invisible Man
BEST ACTING ENSEMBLE:
Emma.
The Banker
Elizabeth Moss - The Invisible Man
The Invisible Man
Total list of nominations
Sunday, 3 January 2021
Review: Soul
It's strange anticipating a new Pixar release that I won't see on the big screen. This studio have given us some of the best animated features of the last 25 years with great cinematic value.
So my anticipation for this newest project felt peculiar to say the least.
While the story starts off nicely at a pleasant pace with nothing at all challenging. My senses and thoughts start racing with not only surprising story developments but unexpected styles of animation that I've not seen Pixar do at all.
With the added mature themes, a touch of complexity and something to keep the younger viewers entertained, it had me completely fascinated and not having a clue where this was going.
A moving and emotional final act gave us that bit of that vintage Pixar magic to remind us that this studio can still warm our hearts with even the most imaginative of narratives.
The voicework was pretty top notch with a few noticeable voices at work. Jamie Foxx continues to show how underused he is as a voice actor. Tina Fey for me stole the show and made the most of her well written character and had solid chemistry with Foxx.
I also have to give props to Rachel House, Alice Braga, the unexpected appearance of Graham Norton and the familiar voice of Richard Ayoade.
As for the production, I really liked how a lot of the film puts you into a dreamlike state. That place between life and death and consciousness and unconsciousness. Giving the film that vibe worked perfectly for my viewing experience.
I really liked the inventiveness of the worlds it creates and how it managed to make sense of it all.
The varied amount of animation styles surprised me as well as the choice of style it decided to show on screen. It was amazing how some of the simplest animation styles that was portrayed never felt out of place and perfectly enhanced the story as well as its characters.
But when it came to Pixar's expected style of animation, it continues to improve and become incredibly detailed. Their moments of photo-realism in their films will forever amaze me.
However if I was to be picky to find negatives, I could say there are times when the story tries to be a bit too clever for its own good and the narrative somewhat gets lost. Also, I don't quite feel the characters were as well developed or as instantly memorable as past Pixar characters.
So while I don't feel the story is as strong or as emotionally gripping as other Pixar films such as Inside Out, there is still plenty to like and get invested in. Its imagery is incredibly moving and satisfying, there is a lot of heart to this story, its themes are universal and it is told with great maturity that its younger viewers can understand over time.
Pixar continue to not be afraid to make their stories sometimes more understanding for adults than children. But still have plenty for everyone to enjoy. They haven't lost any momentum since their big-screen arrival in 1995 and I look forward to see where they go next.
Rating: 8/10
Thursday, 31 December 2020
Review: Mank
It's been six years since the last David Fincher film. The longest gap between any Fincher project since his debut in 1992.
Almost all of his films have become either cults favourites, timeless classics or major awards contenders.
With this latest feature covering how one of the greatest films ever made was written, cinephile's like myself would naturally be intrigued by something like this.
I think going into this appreciating or at least watching Citizen Kane will help as I cannot see this being marketable to the masses. So for me, there was a lot to like for me.
It is most certainly a well made film. It has that perfect mix of showing similar imagery to Citizen Kane whilst also having that Fincher touch. I also liked some of the nods to certain filming techniques that were used from the time period. From the cigarette burns, to the style of music by Trent Raznor and Atticus Ross, to the way it is edited at times. It felt very much of the 30's and 40's. There was even a drunk/drowsy sequence that copied the style of certain late 20's early 30's filming techniques which was nice to see.
The screenplay by Fincher's late father Jack is very well written. There's lot of strong back-and-forth sequences that Aaron Sorkin would be proof. It gives solid development to many characters to at least have one memorable moment on screen. It also covers certain stories that would intrigue film historians.
While there are several theories on certain aspects that the film covers, I think because it is executed in an effective and dramatic way, I don't think it mattered too much whether what they portray on screen is the cold hard facts as this is a drama rather than a documentary.
The performances were pretty good on the whole. Gary Oldman is great in the lead and I wouldn't be surprised if he has another year as an Oscar contender. Amanda Seyfried surprised me and had great moments in here and could also sneak a major awards push. Lily Collins fitted the role perfectly and had memorable chemistry with Oldman. Charles Dance was a nice surprise and had real presence whenever he was on screen.
It's biggest drawback is sadly the lack of emotional drive with the story. While the story was very interesting, I could not see myself wanting to watch it again straight away or anytime soon expect for maybe doing some analysis of the techniques involved.
That for me is where it will be seen by general audiences as slow, dull and boring which is entirely understandable.
It's gorgeously made and that is probably why I highly appreciate this film. But I would fit this under style over substance unfortunatly. I love how it looks, how it was made and the topics it cover and for that reason I have to give it an outstanding rating. But missing that impact with my emotions and not having the pacing that gives it steady flow makes more of a prestige film than a one for the masses.
Rating: 8/10
Wednesday, 30 December 2020
Review: Wonder Woman 1984
After the success of Patty Jenkins' 2017 first outing. I was intrigued to see how the sequel would fare, as the original was one of the few films within the DCEU that I would happily own a copy of or watch again.
After the pretty cool prologue, the start did have me fearing the worst. While it was cool seeing the mid 80's portrayed on a cinema screen in 2020, the campy tone did have me getting similar vibes of 'The Amazing Spider-Man 2'.
But it did also feel like it was paying homage to those silly 80's comedies. So I remained hopeful that there would be a payoff.
I felt I eventually got something that was worth watching. The narrative and its themes is definitely something we've all experienced on another film or TV show. But I felt the execution was solid enough and the timing of this film made it somewhat refreshing and welcoming.
What made it work for me was that I could feel the stakes and threats involved and able to accept most of its moments of quirkiness and disbelief.
Gal Gadot still proves how great of a casting choice she was as Wonder Woman. Her perfect mix of beauty and strength continues to be ideal. Seeing Chris Pine reprise his role will have many questioning the reasoning for this despite how his character ends in the first film. But I felt it eventually made sense and again paid homage to those hammy comedies of the time period. Pine might have partly lacked that charisma you usually get from him. But it was perfectly function for what his character had to do in this one. Kristen Wiig is basically playing a role we've seen Jamie Foxx, Jim Carrey and Uma Thurman do in similar superhero films. But I felt Wiig did well with what she was given. Her development was solid, there were moments where I felt she was a good match for Gadot until at the very end when her transformation felt sudden and almost undeserving and incoherent. Pedro Pascal was a nice surprise given his character is over-the-top. His transformation was well executed and I think he eventually fitted the tone rather well.
There is a nice little touch to end on during the mid-credits scene. It certainly put a smile on my face and I can see a certain chunk of audience enjoying it.
From the technical side, the production, costumes and make-up are as high-quality as you would expect. The 80's period setting was right on the money. However, the pacing felt uneven for the most part and I would say its 2hrs 31mins is far too long for what it was trying to say.
As for the script, while it wasn't anything spectacular, it was perfectly fine for the vibe Jenkins seemed to be going for.
So to conclude, yes the type of story and its themes is something we've seen done by several films of TV shows and people will see this plot device as lazy. But I still felt fairly entertained by it. The characters felt well developed. I could feel the stakes involved and some iconic parts of Wonder Woman that were introduced on the big screen for the first time were great moments.
I agree that it is nowhere near as thrilling or meaningful as the first Wonder Woman and it doesn't reach the same heights of emotion. But sometimes, films don't need to match those heights and I still felt entertained by this.
There is definitely a homage to quirky 80's comedies. With the added themes, this film felt like a mix of Bruce Almighty, the quirky comedic side to Richard Lester's Superman features, the romantic side of Richard Donner's Superman from 1978 and even one scene that is straight out of Raiders Of The Lost Ark. That last sentence won't work to everyone's tastes. But it certainly will appeal to certain demographics. In an age where people expect seriousness to their superhero films, it was nice to get a reminder of the superhero films of the 80's that were successful and weren't afraid to be quirky at times.
It will be interesting to hear other views of this. Quite a lot of people did give the previous installment a lot of high praise. I can expect some disappointment as the tone is fairly different and its more light-hearted then you might expect. So while it may come across that I'm trying to defend the film. I'm actually saying that there is definitely an audience for this.
Rating: 7/10
Sunday, 13 December 2020
Review: Wolfwalkers
Irish animation studio Cartoon Saloon are starting to become a big favourite within its genre and are challenging other studios such as Aardman Animation, Laika, Studio Ghibli, Pixar and Disney in relation to high quality animation and story-telling.
So far, we have had nothing but great features from them such as The Secret Of The Kells and the Oscar nominated films Song Of The Sea and The Breadwinner.
Now, it's back to Ireland with folklore adventure stories for the studios fourth project.
From the first minute I felt instantly at ease, knowing I was in safe hands and ready for an entertaining story. The hand-drawn animation is so pleasing and comforting that the entire duration was an incredibly relaxing experience.
The themes of love and loss and the separation of our connection with nature made it an enchanting and gripping story. As the film went on, the animation almost manages to evolve as well. The shapes and symmetrical look it has as well as the choice of colours really shows you why Cartoon Saloon is standing out from other animation studios.
The voice work is very good all across the board. Honor Kneafsey and Eva Whittaker did a great job as the two main characters and showed great natural chemistry. Sean Bean is instantly recognisable with his voice and supported the story well. Another voice work that was recognisable and done well cast was Simon McBurney, who always fits the bill well as a villain.
Also, the score by Bruno Coulais fits the period perfectly and really soothes you. It will certainly be a score that I'll listen to multiple times over the next few years at least.
But the star of the show is the animation. Every frame was a pure feast for the eyes. The entire animation department should be so proud of themselves as this is probably the best looking film from this studio.
There was only gripe that I was having towards the end and that was not feeling a great deal of threat from the main antagonist. There were moments that reminded me of Claude Frollo from Disney's version of The Hunchback Of Notre Dame. But I rarely felt that character could compete with the protagonists.
Like with all of Cartoon Saloon's previous films, this just warms the heart so well. The story is well structured and developed, the themes are universal and relatable, the characters are engaging, the score is satisfying and the animation is absolutely glorious.
It's a completely satisfying and reassuring viewing experience for all the family and it is one of those films almost cleanses you of all of your negative vibes which is lovely story.
I don't think it's the complete package that Song Of The Sea was. As mentioned before, I felt the villain wasn't strong enough to be a big of a threat to our protagonists. But it is still a film that I would highly recommend, especially if you're feeling down.
Rating: 8/10



























